<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ThreeDimensionalPeople &#187; grumble</title>
	<atom:link href="http://threedimensionalpeople.com/category/grumble/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://threedimensionalpeople.com</link>
	<description>Why don&#039;t you go outside and play with the three dimensional people?</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 14:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>First taste of Terminal 5. Nice building, shame about the moving parts.</title>
		<link>http://threedimensionalpeople.com/2008/03/first-taste-of-terminal-5-nice-building-shame-about-the-moving-parts/</link>
		<comments>http://threedimensionalpeople.com/2008/03/first-taste-of-terminal-5-nice-building-shame-about-the-moving-parts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 21:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[grumble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heathrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heathwoe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://threedimensionalpeople.com/2008/03/first-taste-of-terminal-5-nice-building-shame-about-the-moving-parts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just had my first experience of Terminal 5. Thought I’d pen some notes about it on the plane, rather than bite the head off a chicken or similarly handy rodent. Heathrow’s Terminal 5 is a slap in the face of the current UK government’s love of big tangled public private partnerships. It was surprisingly delivered [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fthreedimensionalpeople.com%2F2008%2F03%2Ffirst-taste-of-terminal-5-nice-building-shame-about-the-moving-parts%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fthreedimensionalpeople.com%2F2008%2F03%2Ffirst-taste-of-terminal-5-nice-building-shame-about-the-moving-parts%2F&amp;style=normal&amp;b=2" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/gallery/2005/07/25/T5_lr300.jpg"><img style="cursor: pointer; width: 320px;" src="http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/gallery/2005/07/25/T5_lr300.jpg" alt="" border="0" /></a></p>
<p>Just had my first experience of Terminal 5. Thought I’d pen some notes about  it on the plane, rather than bite the head off a chicken or similarly handy  rodent.
<p>Heathrow’s Terminal 5 is a slap in the face of the current UK government’s  love of big tangled public private partnerships. It was <a href="http://newsbiscuit.com/board/20/62/0//Contractor-apologises-over-prompt-comple.html">surprisingly  delivered on time and on budget</a> primarily it seems because there was  actually somebody responsible for getting it done. While there were  subcontractors, there would be no mealy-mouthed blame-shifting and finger  pointing when it failed, was shoddy, late and over budget, as big projects in  this country inevitably are. There would be no tangled webs of intricate  outsorcery, no rapacious subcontractors sucking eagerly on sweetened, risk-free  deals, only to sue at the drop of a hat for little breaches of large contracts.  With this government’s prediliction to fudge and quango (is that a verb? should  be) there is often no real sense of right and wrong and clear ownership. The  lawyers and economists trough happily, while Joe Public normally gets trampled  underfoot. </p>
<p>So my heart was lifted when I heard that Terminal 5 touched down on time with  perfect poise – one in the eye for common sense I thought. And the pictures of  the terminal were indeed not bad for London, used to dealing with the  infra-tragedy that is Heathrow Terminal’s 1–4 – a creaking, dirty place that  makes Zimbabwe look like a bation of good management. </p>
<p>And how many airlines have the luxury to have their very own terminal, all to  themselves? BA must have been delighted themselves that they could finally set  aside their usual excuse of shoddy experience – not us gov, it’s BAA – and work  to make this the best in flight experience money and technology could buy. The  <a href="http://www.terminal5.ba.com/en/our-terminal-5-vision/">website</a>  holds little back: “The creation of Terminal 5 was a once-in-a-lifetime  opportunity for us to redefine air travel. Our aim was to replace the queues,  the crowds and the stress with space, light and calm.” Fat chance. Their proud  claim in the adverts of 10 minutes from check in to departure gate even had me  rather excited. Fuggedaboutit. </p>
<p>The news stories started to <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7318568.stm">flood in </a>– perhaps  with a sense of schadenfreude. I checked mine – still on time – and checked-in  online at BA’s site - all working fine. </p>
<p>When I arrived to catch my flight I had left half an hour to get through  security. In terminal 1 there is a separate section for Exec Club members and  biz class, and it’s really pretty good most of the time. When I arrived the  massive foyer of Terminal 5 it’s not obvious what you do. I asked where to go  through security, and they said – South securty was full, so go to North  security. Er, ok. Any Exec Club Gold Card option? Er, they might be one over in  South side, but it was “miles away” and not worth the bother. </p>
<p><strong>>> Figuring out where security was: 2 minutes. </strong></p>
<p>So I head to the North security. Nobody had told us that there doing  biometric checks before security. Seemed to be taking pictures of everyone. Why?  Apparently because international and domestic passengers were mixing up. And the  point of that is what? This system was completely borked. Long lines just to get  through to the next lines waiting for security. As the queues mount, flustered  staff run around on walkie-talkies. There are absolutely loads of them with blue  Tshirts on offering to help. But it seems they spent on all money on greeters  and none on the security desks. So, they decide that anyone on international  flights can just go through without getting their brained scanned, iris  extracted or first born branded, or whatever they were doing. We trundle through  to cattle station 2 security. </p>
<p><strong>>> Waiting in a fruitless line to get a biometric whatsit  taken, but then just being ushered through: 20mins.</strong> </p>
<p>Inside a big airy hall there are about 50 security machines. Unfortunately  there are only about 5 open. I hear someone say there’s a fast track line over  there, so I trundle through (even though wasn’t biz class, i reckon my gold card  sort of counts, no?). Getting to the second line it doesn’t seem to be moving.  There are about 10 staff on the solitary machine, and each seem to be having  long conversations with each passenger and moving at a glacial pace. A bunch of  people rush to the front of the queue with that serious “i’m going to miss my  flight but i’m also a bit embarassed to be queue jumping look on”. We stand  around. As am getting close to the front, an uninspiring lady says – “go to the  next machine, this one’s broken”. Sorry doesn’t seem to be in their vocabulary.  Trundle off to next door machine. Bags go in. Laptop stays in bag – yay – and am  through security.</p>
<p><strong>>> Getting through the world’s slowest “Fast track” security  line: 20mins</strong></p>
<p>And then I have to figure out which gate am meant to be going from. Ooh look  – big shiny LCD screens. near the exit from security. But no, they are for  adverts. There’s a big screen in the middle of the foyer, I go there and find  that I’m in Gate B45. That means getting to the shiny shuttles – reminiscent of  most American airports I’ve been to. So on i hop, and emerge at the B gates.  </p>
<p><strong>>> Going from security to the B gates. 10mins (includes running  up two escalators with bags)</strong></p>
<p>I arrive breathless at the gate, and despite being after the gate closing  time, we’ve not boarded. Great. Mill around for a while, and then when we are  called to get on, they announce that the shiny new walkway is not working, so  we’ve going to have to take steps down to the tarmac, then steps up to the  plane. That’s my favourite bit about Heathrow – they always seem to have broken  walkways, but this on day 4 of the next terminal seems a bit rich. </p>
<p><strong>>> Getting on the plane and dozing the stress away:  priceless.</strong></p>
<p>So, in the end i got my flight. Yet it was just a collossal disappointment  that had nothing to do with a bunch of lost bags. It was as if we’d spent £4bn  on a nice shiny car, but nobody had bothered to learn how to drive it. There  really should be as much thought going into the processes and the staff as the  buildings, and that is where I blame BAA management for now figuring out the  process better. It wasn’t a question of early hitches - this seemed like a  terminal without a plan and the people didn’t seem to have been told what they  should be doing. Still, the good news is maybe they’ll learn given the massive  media pressue, and the roof looks nice. The bad news for me is they won’t learn  by the time I have to use it again – twice – this week. </p>
<p><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://threedimensionalpeople.com/2008/03/first-taste-of-terminal-5-nice-building-shame-about-the-moving-parts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

